![]() ![]() By implication, each of these cases represent a data rich environment to start with. ![]() They were selected based on the implementation of recent open contracting reforms and the availability of procurement data for both before and after the reforms. We analyse three countries: Mexico, Paraguay and Slovakia. who are the stakeholders and enablers that are the actual drivers of change using increased transparency. It establishes a robust methodology to explore what impacts can be measured and also explores the channels through which transparency is indeed impactful – e.g. In order to address this evidence gap, this research supported by a consortium of not-for -profit organisations (Open Contracting Partnership, HIVOS, The B Team) interested in improving procurement policy and impact, explores the short-term effects of public procurement transparency reforms on corruption risks, institutional efficiency, competition and prices by comparing procurement outcomes before and after the change in transparency regulations. In spite of such major policy developments, we still lack the specific and rigorous evidence on the impact of transparency interventions and which types of transparency matter for which actors to support desirable societal outcomes such as high quality public services, procedural justice or public sector integrity (Bauhr et al, 2019). GTI-WP/2020:01, Budapest: Government Transparency Institute.Įnhancing the transparency of government in general and of public procurement processes in particular has been increasingly on the agenda of governments, civil societies and businesses as evidenced by initiatives such as the Open Government Partnership which has seen 70 OGP members making 189 open contracting commitments by March 2019. (2020). Measuring the benefits of open contracting: Case studies on Mexico, Paraguay, and Slovakia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |